Advertisement

Big money behind battle over methadone access

Big money behind battle over methadone access

Unlocking the Potential: Expanding Access to Methadone for Addiction Treatment

In a heartbreaking story, Dr. James Baker recounts the loss of his son Macky, who succumbed to a heroin overdose in 2016 after battling addiction for years. Baker believes that if they had better access to methadone, a drug that relieves cravings for opioids, Macky might still be alive today. However, the current federal regulations limit the distribution of methadone to tightly regulated clinics, making it inaccessible for many struggling with addiction. This article explores the ongoing debate surrounding the expansion of methadone access and the potential impact it could have on saving lives.

Unlocking the Potential to Save Lives

The Struggle for Accessibility

Dr. James Baker's personal experience with the loss of his son Macky highlights the urgent need for improved access to methadone, a medication that has proven to be highly effective in treating opioid addiction. Macky's battle with addiction lasted for years, and Baker believes that if methadone had been more readily available, his son might still be alive today.The current system requires individuals seeking methadone treatment to travel to tightly regulated Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs), often located miles away from their homes. This logistical challenge can be a significant barrier for those in recovery, as Macky himself expressed, calling methadone "liquid handcuffs" and stating that he "just can't do that." The arduous daily commute and the requirement to be observed taking the medication can make the treatment feel more like a burden than a solution, deterring many from seeking the help they desperately need.

The Proven Effectiveness of Methadone

Dr. Sarah Wakeman, the Senior Medical Director for Substance Use Disorder at Mass General Brigham, has witnessed the transformative power of methadone in her patients' recovery journeys. Methadone, she explains, effectively eliminates withdrawal symptoms and cravings for opioids, allowing individuals to function normally and reclaim their lives. Wakeman's firsthand experience has convinced her of the urgent need to make this life-saving medication more widely available."We could be saving so many more lives," Wakeman asserts, highlighting the stark contrast between the proven benefits of methadone and the restrictive regulations that limit its distribution. As a board-certified addiction doctor, Wakeman is frustrated by the fact that she cannot prescribe methadone to her patients, even though she can prescribe it for pain management. This incongruity, she argues, is "just wild and doesn't make any sense."

Challenging the Status Quo

U.S. Senator Ed Markey, D-Mass., has co-sponsored a bill that aims to address this issue by allowing the 7,000 board-certified addiction doctors in the United States, including Wakeman, to prescribe methadone for addiction treatment. This would enable patients to pick up their medication at a local pharmacy, rather than having to travel to an OTP every morning.Markey's stance reflects a growing recognition that the current system, rooted in the Nixon-era "War on Drugs" strategy, is outdated and in need of reform. He emphasizes the importance of prioritizing "treatment, more to accessibility, more to thinking about the patient more than the provider, more than the opioid treatment programs that now corner the market and don't allow for fundamental change."However, Markey's efforts to expand methadone access face fierce opposition from the industry, represented by the National Association for Behavioral Healthcare (NABH). Sarah Wattenberg, the director of quality and addiction services at NABH, argues that the current system protects patients by providing close monitoring and counseling, and that prescribing methadone outside of OTPs could lead to "a lot of people dying."

The Profit-Driven Landscape

A closer examination of the methadone clinic landscape in Massachusetts reveals a concerning trend. A 5 Investigates analysis found that just two for-profit companies, BayMark Health Services and Acadia Healthcare, run nearly half of the 54 methadone clinics in the state.These companies have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, as evidenced by Acadia Healthcare's statement to its stockholders, which acknowledges that any "material change in the current payment programs or regulatory, economic, environmental or competitive conditions" in Massachusetts and four other states could have a "disproportionate effect" on its overall business results.The industry's opposition to expanding methadone access, as expressed by Wattenberg, raises questions about the role of profit-driven motives in shaping the debate. When confronted with the potential conflict of interest, Wattenberg's response, "you know doctors make a profit, right?" suggests a dismissive attitude towards the concerns raised by addiction specialists like Wakeman.

Balancing Safety and Accessibility

The industry's argument for maintaining the current system centers on the need to ensure patient safety and proper medical supervision. Wattenberg argues that "methadone is a very powerful drug" and that its use "without proper medical supervision" could lead to "a lot of people dying."However, Dr. Wakeman and others argue that the existing model of daily visits to OTPs is not the only way to ensure safe and effective methadone treatment. They advocate for a more patient-centered approach that prioritizes accessibility without compromising safety.The upcoming reforms, which will allow states to expand access to methadone through telehealth and prescriptions for people under 18, are a step in the right direction. But Wakeman and her colleagues believe these changes do not go far enough, as OTPs will still be the sole providers of the necessary wraparound services."We need to create a system that makes it as easy as possible for people to access welcoming person-centered high quality care," Wakeman asserts. "That includes access to medications. And for many people, the current model of having to go daily to a clinic is not going to ever allow them to access the treatment that they need."

A Call for Compassion and Innovation

Dr. James Baker's personal experience with the loss of his son Macky has fueled his advocacy for greater access to methadone. He acknowledges the importance of methadone clinics but believes that the availability of the medication at doctors' offices or through addiction specialists could have made a crucial difference in Macky's life."Methadone, had it been available at the doctor's office or had we found an addiction specialist who could have prescribed it out of the office. Macky might be here right now," Baker says, his words echoing the heartbreak and determination that drive his mission.As the debate over methadone access continues, it is clear that the stakes are high. The lives of countless individuals struggling with opioid addiction hang in the balance, and the need for a compassionate, innovative, and patient-centered approach to treatment has never been more urgent. By breaking down the barriers to methadone and empowering addiction specialists to provide this life-saving medication, the healthcare system can take a significant step towards addressing the opioid crisis and honoring the memory of those, like Macky, who have been lost.

Advertisement